<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPv6 at RIPE-55 and an upcoming communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://signal.eu.org/blog/2007/10/24/ipv6-at-ripe-55-and-an-upcoming-communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://signal.eu.org/blog/2007/10/24/ipv6-at-ripe-55-and-an-upcoming-communication/</link>
	<description>voie libre ou appel système</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mohsen</title>
		<link>http://signal.eu.org/blog/2007/10/24/ipv6-at-ripe-55-and-an-upcoming-communication/#comment-4456</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://signal.eu.org/blog/2007/10/24/ipv6-at-ripe-55-and-an-upcoming-communication/#comment-4456</guid>
		<description>If we refer to the slide #38 of G. Huston's presentation, the ETNO position as
expressed in their presentation seems to show that Operators are still in the
"Denial State"... As a matter of fact, I can't see any occurrence of the term "IPv6" in their presentation... When will they start to enter the "Panic State" ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we refer to the slide #38 of G. Huston&#8217;s presentation, the ETNO position as<br />
expressed in their presentation seems to show that Operators are still in the<br />
&#8220;Denial State&#8221;&#8230; As a matter of fact, I can&#8217;t see any occurrence of the term &#8220;IPv6&#8243; in their presentation&#8230; When will they start to enter the &#8220;Panic State&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stéphane Bortzmeyer</title>
		<link>http://signal.eu.org/blog/2007/10/24/ipv6-at-ripe-55-and-an-upcoming-communication/#comment-4321</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane Bortzmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://signal.eu.org/blog/2007/10/24/ipv6-at-ripe-55-and-an-upcoming-communication/#comment-4321</guid>
		<description>The way I read Geoff Huston's paper, it also says that it is already too late. There is now no way we can have completed the transition before IPv4 space runs out :-( 

So, after having spent a lot of time and effort trying to make IPv6 networks work in a mostly-IPv4 network, we'll have to find a way to make the legacy IPv4 work, even after the Internet will have moved to v6.

That's the result of many years spent saying "May be one day".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I read Geoff Huston&#8217;s paper, it also says that it is already too late. There is now no way we can have completed the transition before IPv4 space runs out <img src='http://signal.eu.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, after having spent a lot of time and effort trying to make IPv6 networks work in a mostly-IPv4 network, we&#8217;ll have to find a way to make the legacy IPv4 work, even after the Internet will have moved to v6.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the result of many years spent saying &#8220;May be one day&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
