{"id":764,"date":"2012-07-25T11:30:23","date_gmt":"2012-07-25T10:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/?p=764"},"modified":"2012-07-25T13:55:37","modified_gmt":"2012-07-25T12:55:37","slug":"signalspam-emailvision-gmail-et-le-spam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/25\/signalspam-emailvision-gmail-et-le-spam\/","title":{"rendered":"Signalspam, emailvision, gmail et le spam"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"twitter-share\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?via=pbeyssac\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\"><em>(petit texte r\u00e9sumant\/archivant un ensemble de tweets r\u00e9alis\u00e9s ce matin)<\/em><\/p>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">Ce matin, je tombe sur <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/bortzmeyer\/status\/228038000708313090\">ce tweet<\/a> de St\u00e9phane Bortzmeyer :\u00a0<em>Si vous doutiez encore que SignalSpam, c&#8217;est du pipeau :\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/eric.bachard.org\/news\/index.php?post\/2012\/07\/20\/Une-histoire-de-spam-...-et-de-spammeurs\">http:\/\/eric.bachard.org\/news\/index.php?post\/2012\/07\/20\/Une-histoire-de-spam-&#8230;-et-de-spammeurs<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">J&#8217;ai <a href=\"http:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/2007\/05\/15\/lutte-contre-le-spam\/\">d\u00e9j\u00e0 parl\u00e9 ici<\/a> de SignalSpam.<\/p>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">Et en effet, en fouinant dans mon dossier de spam, je constate que le prestataire concern\u00e9 (emailvision), dont SignalSpam se gargarise du partenariat, m&#8217;a envoy\u00e9 104 spams depuis 8 mois exactement, sans compter une newsletter exp\u00e9di\u00e9e pour le compte de Bouygues T\u00e9l\u00e9com dont personne n&#8217;arrive \u00e0 me d\u00e9sabonner depuis des mois, ni moi-m\u00eame via les proc\u00e9dures pr\u00e9vues pour cela, ni le support Bouygues lui-m\u00eame.<\/p>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">Bref, voici l&#8217;incantation pour mutt pour trier tout \u00e7a avant envoi \u00e0 SignalSpam. Cela risque de ne pas servir \u00e0 grand chose, mais c&#8217;est vite fait :<\/p>\n<pre style=\"padding-left: 30px;\" data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\"><strong>l ~h ^X-EMV-CampagneId:<\/strong><\/pre>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">V\u00e9rifiez les messages et marquez (tag : t) ceux qui sont effectivement des spams. 241 sur 261 dans mon cas, car emailvision est op\u00e9rateur de newsletters pour des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, ce qui lui permet de nier de toute responsabilit\u00e9 dans l&#8217;exploitation de listes d&#8217;adresses collect\u00e9es par d\u00e9tournement de finalit\u00e9. 241\/261 est donc le ratio de spam et on voit que l&#8217;activit\u00e9 r\u00e9elle hors spam est r\u00e9duite \u00e0 la portion congrue.<\/p>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">Soumettre (avec le script ci-dessous) \u00e0 SignalSpam :<\/p>\n<pre style=\"padding-left: 30px;\" data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\"><strong>;| signalspam votremotdepasse<\/strong><\/pre>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">Mon script Python est l\u00e0 et fonctionne encore : <a href=\"http:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/05\/signalspam.txt\">http:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/05\/signalspam.txt<\/a><\/p>\n<p data-expanded-url=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/Om87Q6\">Google n&#8217;est pas en reste puisque ce m\u00eame matin j&#8217;ai re\u00e7u 11 spams d&#8217;un compte Gmail parfaitement valide, via Google Groups, sans aucun lien <em>abuse<\/em> pour les plaintes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(petit texte r\u00e9sumant\/archivant un ensemble de tweets r\u00e9alis\u00e9s ce matin) Ce matin, je tombe sur ce tweet de St\u00e9phane Bortzmeyer :\u00a0Si vous doutiez encore que SignalSpam, c&#8217;est du pipeau :\u00a0 http:\/\/eric.bachard.org\/news\/index.php?post\/2012\/07\/20\/Une-histoire-de-spam-&#8230;-et-de-spammeurs J&#8217;ai d\u00e9j\u00e0 parl\u00e9 ici de SignalSpam. Et en effet, en fouinant dans mon dossier de spam, je constate que le prestataire concern\u00e9 (emailvision), dont &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/25\/signalspam-emailvision-gmail-et-le-spam\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Signalspam, emailvision, gmail et le spam<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15,7,9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/764"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=764"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":767,"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/764\/revisions\/767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/signal.eu.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}